For Christmas I got an interesting present from a friend - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a couple of easy triggers about me supplied by my pal Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of writing, however it's also a bit recurring, and extremely verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's triggers in collecting information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repeated hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had sold around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, given that rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, akropolistravel.com who developed it, can order any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody developing one in anybody's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, produced by AI, and created "solely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is meant as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get offered even more.

He hopes to broaden his range, producing different categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human clients.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we actually suggest human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is images. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for creative purposes need to be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without permission need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really powerful however let's construct it morally and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have picked to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI to utilize creators' content on the web to assist develop their models, unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of joy," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening one of its best performing markets on the vague guarantee of growth."

A government representative said: "No relocation will be made until we are absolutely positive we have a useful plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to help them certify their material, access to high-quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI plan, trade-britanica.trade a national data library consisting of public data from a wide variety of sources will likewise be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the security of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector needed to share information of the functions of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to desire the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits against AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of aspects which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training data and whether it should be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a portion of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for bigger jobs. It has plenty of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to check out in parts because it's so verbose.

But provided how quickly the tech is progressing, I'm not sure for how long I can stay confident that my substantially slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in global innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.