For Christmas I received an intriguing gift from a buddy - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a few easy prompts about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and really funny in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of composing, but it's also a bit repetitive, and really verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's prompts in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, since rotating from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can buy any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in any person's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and created "exclusively to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, pyra-handheld.com however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is planned as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.

He wants to widen his range, generating different categories such as sci-fi, and maybe providing an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - selling AI-generated products to human customers.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce similar material based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are discussing data here, we really imply human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think the use of generative AI for creative purposes need to be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without authorization must be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely effective however let's construct it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually selected to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to use developers' material on the web to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise strongly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a whole lot of joy," states the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining one of its best carrying out industries on the unclear pledge of growth."

A government representative stated: "No relocation will be made up until we are definitely positive we have a practical plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to help them license their content, access to top quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide information library consisting of public data from a wide variety of sources will likewise be made offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share information of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a variety of suits versus AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their consent, wiki.vifm.info and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of aspects which can constitute reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training information and whether it need to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it its technology for a fraction of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has plenty of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather challenging to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But given how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm not sure the length of time I can stay positive that my considerably slower human writing and editing abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in worldwide innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters worldwide.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.