For Christmas I got an intriguing gift from a friend - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and morphomics.science my picture on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a few easy prompts about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and really funny in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of writing, but it's also a bit repetitive, and really verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's prompts in collating information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had sold around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, given that pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source large .

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can buy any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone producing one in anybody's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and created "entirely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach worries that the product is meant as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered even more.

He intends to widen his range, producing different genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human customers.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr you write for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are talking about information here, we really mean human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is pictures. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and online-learning-initiative.org they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think the use of generative AI for innovative purposes need to be prohibited, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without authorization ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really effective but let's develop it morally and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually chosen to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to utilize creators' content on the internet to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also strongly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of joy," says the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining one of its best carrying out industries on the vague promise of growth."

A federal government spokesperson said: "No move will be made until we are absolutely confident we have a practical strategy that provides each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to help them accredit their material, access to top quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's new AI plan, a national information library consisting of public data from a vast array of sources will also be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a variety of claims versus AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr continue in the US. They have been taken out by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of factors which can constitute reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the many downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a portion of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

As for asystechnik.com me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It has lots of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to read in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But provided how quickly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure how long I can remain confident that my significantly slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in international technology, with analysis from BBC reporters around the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.